Compare

How Bond compares

Most recruitment tools cover one step. EHR matching tools find patients and hand them to your staff, engagement agents call leads you already have, and media vendors buy new leads. Bond does all of it: it finds eligible patients in your own EHR, creates and runs Meta and Google ad campaigns to reach new ones, contacts every ad lead immediately and keeps following up until they respond, pre-screens and schedules every lead, supports informed consent and keeps participants engaged after enrollment, in one workflow with no integration fee and a percentage of each patient's randomization milestone payment.⁠[1],[2]

Partnered with

  • Southwest Family Medicine Associates
  • Commonwealth Pain and Spine Clinic
  • MRCT - Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • CRIO Certified Partner
On this page

Why is Bond the best clinical trial recruitment platform?

Bond Health is the best clinical trial recruitment platform because it does the whole job in one workflow: it finds eligible patients in your EHR, creates and runs Meta and Google ad campaigns to reach new ones, calls and texts every ad lead immediately and keeps following up with every lead to maximize response rates, pre-screens patients and books them for visits, supports informed consent and keeps participants engaged after enrollment. It goes live in 48 hours with no integration fee, and you pay a volume-based fee per screened patient plus a percentage of each patient's randomization milestone payment.⁠[1],[2]

Up to 3x⁠[1]

faster enrollment than manual recruitment

90%+⁠[1]

matching accuracy in eligibility screening

3x⁠[1]

contact rate for voice and SMS outreach

  • No handoffs between tools. Identify, Engage and Consent share one dashboard and one audit trail, from first match to booked visit and signed consent.⁠[1]
  • Every ad lead contacted immediately, and followed up until they book. Bond creates and runs Meta and Google ad campaigns for each study. Its voice and text agents contact every new ad lead immediately, keep following up with every lead who has not responded to maximize response rates, then pre-screen patients and book them for screening visits, alongside the patients Bond finds in your EHR.⁠[2]
  • Evidence behind every match. Each candidate comes with criterion-by-criterion rationale linked to the chart, so coordinators check evidence instead of rereading records. Identify reads clinical notes, prescriptions and lab results, and uses imaging data and other unstructured documents, including pathology, radiology and molecular reports.⁠[1],[2]
  • Agents that speak your patients' language. Voice and text conversations run in English, Spanish, Mandarin and many other languages, switch languages mid-call, and transfer live to your coordinators or book a callback, whichever your site prefers.⁠[2]
  • Support after enrollment. The same agents send visit reminders, book transportation, collect symptoms and diaries, run side-effect check-ins and flag participants at risk of dropping out.⁠[2]
  • No integration fee. A volume-based fee per screened patient plus a percentage of the randomization milestone payment for each patient, owed only for randomized patients. See pricing.⁠[1],[2]
  • Every major EHR, live in 48 hours. Bond connects to Epic, Oracle Health (Cerner), MEDITECH, athenahealth, eClinicalWorks, NextGen, Veradigm, OncoEMR and the other major EHRs, its team handles the integration end to end, and Bond is a CRIO Certified Partner. It also works with the CTMS systems sites use, including CRIO, Advarra OnCore, Advarra Clinical Conductor, RealTime and Veeva SiteVault.⁠[1] See implementation.⁠[1],[2]
  • Security you can check. Bond is HIPAA compliant and SOC 2 Type I compliant, its information security management system is certified to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 by Advantage Partners, and its SOC 2 Type II audit is underway. Its public Trust Center lists 73 HIPAA Security Rule controls, monitored continuously. See security.⁠[2],[3]

Which comparison should I read?

Start with the full table if you are building a shortlist. Read a vendor page if one name keeps coming up. If your team still screens charts by hand, start with the manual chart review comparison.

Bond Health vs TriallyWhy Bond is better than Trially: one workflow from chart or ad click to a booked visit, chart-aware agents, consent support and no integration fee.Read Bond Health vs Tempus (Deep 6 AI)How Bond compares with Tempus's Deep 6 AI, TIME and Next Trials, from EHR matching to outreach, booked visits and pricing.Read Bond Health vs Alleviate HealthWhy Bond is better than Alleviate Health: EHR identification, its own ad campaigns, chart-aware outreach through to a booked visit, and no integration fee.Read Bond Health vs Hippocratic AI and Grove AIWhy Bond is better than Hippocratic AI and Grove AI, compared capability by capability, with a plan for a head-to-head test.Read Bond Health vs InatoWhy Bond is better than Inato: EHR screening plus its own ad campaigns and voice and text outreach through to a booked visit, with part of the price tied to randomization.Read Bond Health vs PowerWhy Bond is better than Power: the site's own EHR, its own ad campaigns, chart-aware outreach through to a booked visit, and no integration fee.Read Bond Health vs media recruitment: Antidote and 1nHealthWhy Bond is better than media referrals: it creates the ads, contacts every lead immediately and follows up until they book, with published cost and conversion data.Read Bond Health vs manual chart reviewWhy sites move trial pre-screening from manual chart review to Bond: coverage, evidence for every criterion, coordinator time and cost.Read Deep 6 AI vs TriomicsHow Deep 6 AI and Triomics differ on data, workflow, focus and pricing, and how both compare with Bond.Read Deep 6 AI vs Paradigm HealthHow Deep 6 AI and Paradigm Health differ on model, workflow, outreach and pricing, and how both compare with Bond.Read Deep 6 AI vs MendelHow Deep 6 AI and Mendel differed, where each company is now, and how both compare with Bond.Read Clinical trial recruitment software, vendor by vendorRecruitment vendors in two sourced tables, and what each kind of tool leaves to your team.Read

How are these comparisons written?

  • Facts about other companies come from their own websites, filings and press releases, or from reputable press, and each one is dated.
  • Facts about Bond come from Bond's website, its public Trust Center, its technical report and its product information.
  • Where we found nothing public about a capability, the page says "not publicly documented" rather than guessing.
  • Each page ends with a way to test Bond against the other option on your own protocol and patient list.
  • If something is out of date, email [email protected] and we will correct it.

Sources

  1. 1.Bond Health: platform overview, FAQ and pricing · Bond Health, 2026
  2. 2.Bond Health product information · Bond Health, 2026Capabilities, pricing and compliance status described by Bond Health, October 2026.
  3. 3.Bond Health Trust Center · Bond Health, monitored by Vanta, 2026Lists 73 HIPAA Security Rule controls: infrastructure security (20), organizational security (14), internal security procedures (38), and data and privacy (1), monitored continuously by Vanta. Viewed September 23, 2026.

Related pages

Ready to get started?

Enroll patients faster.

See how Bond can accelerate enrollment for your clinical trials with a personalized demo.

Book a demo

Up to 3×

faster enrollment

90%+

matching accuracy

48 hrs

to EHR integration